Skip to content
Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaMYT (+6) 03-7890 3946
Laboratories and regulated production

Records that hold up to a regulator, not just to an inspection

Lab work, quality checks and regulatory files usually live in different places, and the trail gets assembled afterwards. SenangUrus keeps the check, the material and the document on one record so the evidence exists while the work is happening.

What we hear

The five problems that bring this sector to us

These are the problem statements we hear in this sector before any software is discussed. None of them are solved by adding another screen — they are solved by two things sharing one record.

01

Lab records kept on paper and in spreadsheets

Checks are recorded at control points with sampling rules, results and alerts held against the product or material instead of in a workbook.

02

Audit trails patched together after the fact

Document versions, approvals and workflow execution logs are kept by the system, and can be exported as an audit report.

03

Slow handover between lab, quality and regulatory teams

Alerts move through defined stages with priorities, root-cause categories and routing by location, so the follow-up has an owner.

04

Instrument and material data in disconnected files

Equipment, components and consumables sit in one asset register with check-in and sign-off, and materials trace through production and stock.

05

Reporting rebuilt manually every submission cycle

Reports are built once against live records and re-run, rather than rekeyed from three sources each cycle.

Problem by problem

What SenangUrus actually does about each one

Read down the middle column: each answer names a capability that exists in a shipped module, and the right column links straight to it. Where a capability sits in a higher edition, the chip says so.

The problemWhat the system doesModules
Lab records kept on paper and in spreadsheetsChecks are recorded at control points with sampling rules, results and alerts held against the product or material instead of in a workbook.360Quality Management
Audit trails patched together after the factDocument versions, approvals and workflow execution logs are kept by the system, and can be exported as an audit report.360Workflow Automation 360Document Management
Slow handover between lab, quality and regulatory teamsAlerts move through defined stages with priorities, root-cause categories and routing by location, so the follow-up has an owner.360Quality Management 360Workflow Automation
Instrument and material data in disconnected filesEquipment, components and consumables sit in one asset register with check-in and sign-off, and materials trace through production and stock.360Fixed Equipment Management 360Manufacturing Management 360Inventory Management
Reporting rebuilt manually every submission cycleReports are built once against live records and re-run, rather than rekeyed from three sources each cycle.360Report Builder
Shortlist

Modules that matter here — and the ones you can ignore for now

Most businesses in this sector do not need the whole catalogue. This is the shortlist we configure first; everything else stays switched off until it earns its place.

360 module

Quality Management

Control points, sampling rules and alert lifecycle

Open the module

360 module

Manufacturing Management

Bills of materials, routing and work centres

Open the module

360 module

Fixed Equipment Management

Asset register with check-in, components and consumables

Open the module

360 module

Document Management

Version control, approvals and electronic signing

Open the module

360 module

Inventory Management

Materials and finished goods from order to delivery

Open the module

360 module

Report Builder

Submission and trend reporting without development time

Open the module

Recommended edition

SenangUrus 360

Regulated operations running production, quality holds and multi-entity books.

A single-site lab can run on Business for records and stock, but quality control points and production belong to 360.

How a rollout runs here

  • Start with the quality checks that currently sit on paper, at the points the process already defines.
  • Bring equipment and consumables into the asset register before the next internal audit.
  • Set the document hierarchy to match the structure of your regulatory file, not the other way round.

Every sector follows the same five phases — prepare, set up, load, rehearse, go live — described in the onboarding guide, with the interactive checklist on the Resources page.

FAQ

Life Science questions

01/Where do quality results and alerts live?
Each check records its results against the product or batch, and an alert carries a priority, a root-cause category and the location where it failed so the follow-up is traceable.
02/Can we keep the paperwork the regulator expects?
Documents, approvals and workflow execution logs can be exported as a report or PDF for the submission file — generated from the system rather than retyped from it.
03/Do checks interrupt production?
Checks attach to the process at the points you define, with sampling frequency rules, so the hold happens where the risk is rather than at the end of the line.
Next step

Bring your own process to the session

Tell us how the work actually runs in your business — the paperwork, the handovers, the things that get re-typed. We will map it against the platform and say plainly which parts fit.